Those pink ribbons really bug me! I've had breast cancer and so have a lot of my friends which should come as no surprise since the latest statistics claim that 1 in 8 women will get breast cancer in their lifetimes.
Breast cancer awareness month was invented by Astro-Zeneca, makers of Tamoxofin, one of the country's leading breast cancer chemotherapies and Acetochlor, a B2 carcinogen and herbicide.
The message we hear ad nauseum during various pink ribbon events such as Race for the Cure, in magazine articles and with all of the cause-related marketing of products that flood the market in October is "early detection" which roughly translated means you should get frequent mammograms.
Getting yearly mammograms leads to detections of a lot of pre-cancers, which are not cancers and many times can heal themselves.
But if doctors tell you you've got pre-cancer you panic. You panic and then you take the blue pill, The Tamoxofin, the surgery, the radiation, the second mortgage on your home.
It's been studied over and over again and the conclusion continues to be that mammograms do not prolong peoples lives and often put women through unneeded surgeries, chemos and financial disasters. Check your breasts for a palpable mass (a lump) if you've got one, that's when it's time to worry.
I don't know much about how chemicals start cancer but I've been reading a lot about how diet does.
The next time you see women in pink jogging through town think for a minute about who all of that money is going to. It's not going to research diet related causes or environmental causes of cancer. It's likely not going to study causes of cancer at all. It's going to develop more toxic cell-killing chemicals that make companies like Astro Zeneca rich and the rest of us poor. Don't believe the hype.
The following is an article from The Cancer Project. I've omitted the indexes but you can check them for yourself at:
http://www.cancerproject.org/
The Cancer Project also has information about how dietary fiber helps prevent all kinds of cancer.
Breast Cancer
Countries with a higher intake of fat, especially fat from animal products, such as meat and dairy products, have a higher incidence of breast cancer.13,14,15 In Japan, for example, the traditional diet is much lower in fat, especially animal fat, than the typical western diet, and breast cancer rates are low. In the late 1940s, when breast cancer was particularly rare in Japan, less than 10 percent of the calories in the Japanese diet came from fat.16 The American diet is centered on animal products, which tend to be high in fat and low in other important nutrients, with 30 to 35 percent of calories coming from fat. When Japanese girls are raised on westernized diets, their rate of breast cancer increases dramatically. Even within Japan, affluent women who eat meat daily have an 8.5 times higher risk of breast cancer than poorer women who rarely or never eat meat.17 One of the proposed reasons is that fatty foods boost the hormones that promote cancer.
The consumption of high-fat foods such as meat, dairy products, fried foods, and even vegetable oils causes a woman’s body to make more estrogens, which encourage cancer cell growth in the breast and other organs that are sensitive to female sex hormones. This suggests that, by avoiding fatty foods throughout life, hormone-related cancer risk decreases.
A 2003 study, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, found that when girls ages eight to ten reduced the amount of fat in their diet—even very slightly—their estrogen levels were held at a lower and safer level during the next several years. By increasing vegetables, fruits, grains, and beans, and reducing animal-derived foods, the amount of estradiol (a principal estrogen) in their blood dropped by 30 percent, compared to a group of girls who did not change their diets.18
Harvard researchers recently conducted a prospective analysis of 90,655 premenopausal women, ages 26 to 46, enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study II and determined that intake of animal fat, especially from red meat and high-fat dairy products, during premenopausal years is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Increased risk was not associated with vegetable fats.19
In addition, researchers at the Ontario Cancer Institute conducted a meta-analysis of all the case-control and cohort studies published up to July 2003 that studied dietary fat, fat-containing foods, and breast cancer risk. Case-control and cohort study analyses yielded similar risk results, with a high total fat intake associated with increased breast cancer risk. Significant relative risks for meat and saturated fat intake also emerged, with high meat intake increasing cancer risk by 17 percent and high saturated fat intake increasing cancer risk by 19 percent.20
Several studies show meat intake to be a breast cancer risk factor, even when confounding factors, such as total caloric intake and total fat intake, are controlled.21,22 Part of the reason may be that meat becomes a source of carcinogens and/or mutagens, such as HCAs, that are formed while cooking meat at high temperatures. A review of HCAs showed that certain HCAs are distributed to the mammary gland and that humans can activate HCAs metabolically.23 As a consequence, frequent meat consumption may be a risk factor for breast cancer.21
That was just something I needed to get off my chest
